[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:58:53 -0400 |
>> Also ... if we are having post(8) scrub out headers with an Nmh- prefix,
>> we could also have it scrub out any header, like Attach:,
>
>No, we can't. See previous messages from Ralph, kre, and me on that.
Hrm. I interpreted Ralph's email as he wanted to filter out _every_
unknown email header, unless it had a colon prefix; that would remove
misspellings like "Bc:", for example. And kre thought that was a bad
idea (and I agree with that).
Ralph, kre? Would you like to clarify your positions for thick-headed
fellows like me?
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Steffen Nurpmeso, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Andy Bradford, 2016/10/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10