[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: David Levine
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 20:05:18 -0400

Ken wrote:

> I can boil it down to this: these headers may leak out, if there are bugs
> or unusual behavior.  But I have realized ... I don't care.

I do care.  "Be conservative in what you do"

> Thinking about it more, we already leak some "internal" headers out.

Water under the bridge.  Let's do the right thing moving forward.

You mentioned "harm":  it depends on how that's defined.  Sure, MUAs can
igore headers, so no harm there.  But, I define each of intentionally
withholding traceability and polluting a namespace as harmful.

> I mean, yeah, it's not something we should do,

Then let's not.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]