Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

[Ralph Corderoy]

Replying to myself,

> BTW, RFC 2822 defines Bcc, including that it can remain in the sent
> email with no values to indicate to the non-blind recipients that
> blinds were sent.

And other programs, like sendmail, handle Bcc headers so that's a case
where MH's use does blot out another's use.

> So given the only illegal header is `:Forward: +inbox 42', and David's
> traceability argument of having the world knock on our door, I think
> I'm still in favour of an `Nmh-' prefix.

Of course, a UTF-8 prefix is invalid.  ;-)

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy