[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 23:30:17 +0100

Replying to myself,

> BTW, RFC 2822 defines Bcc, including that it can remain in the sent
> email with no values to indicate to the non-blind recipients that
> blinds were sent.

And other programs, like sendmail, handle Bcc headers so that's a case
where MH's use does blot out another's use.

> So given the only illegal header is `:Forward: +inbox 42', and David's
> traceability argument of having the world knock on our door, I think
> I'm still in favour of an `Nmh-' prefix.

Of course, a UTF-8 prefix is invalid.  ;-)

Cheers, Ralph.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]