nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 vs RFC 2231 encoding for MIME parameters


From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] RFC 2047 vs RFC 2231 encoding for MIME parameters
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 09:25:35 -0400

>    Content-Type: inode/x-empty; name*=UTF-8''%41%00%42
>    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*=UTF-8''%41%00%42
>
>`mhstore -auto' creates `./A'.  Perhaps the RFCs rule out %00?  But then
>again, we're talking about crap that doesn't follow the RFCs.  If it's
>%41%2F%42 then `A/B' is created if A exists, so that seems OK.

Sigh. We use a lot of C strings, so we're not so great on handling
embedded NULs.  It's one of those things that is simultanously hard
to fix, and AFAICT not worth it.  Let me ask you, Ralph ... what do you
WANT to happen here?

--Krn



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]