[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh

From: Lyndon Nerenberg
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:19:46 -0700

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> And I believe
> it makes it WORSE; each nmh command starts with a brand-new scan of a
> folder, so messages added or removed between commands work out fine.
> But a FUSE interface would have no idea when an nmh command is starting
> or stopping, so you'd have to do a lot of caching or a new IMAP session
> for each file access.

That pretty much nuts down the issue.  If you want to play IMAP in MH, you must 
become a full-on IMAP client, playing all those locking games. 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]