[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:15:47 -0800 |
address@hidden writes:
Correction:
>Hear, Hear. But I assume and hope that you are talking about new commands
>rather than more arguments to additional commands.
I meant:
Hear, Hear. But I assume and hope that you are talking about new commands
rather than more arguments to existing commands.
Norman Shapiro
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Jon Steinhart, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, norm, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, norm, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh,
norm <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Thomas Levine, 2016/03/16