[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled.
From: |
Andy Bradford |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled. |
Date: |
27 Jul 2015 18:09:09 -0600 |
Thus said Ken Hornstein on Sat, 25 Jul 2015 00:57:45 -0400:
> In theory, I'm with you on that; it would be easier. It's just that a)
> most MUAs don't even have the option to submit to sendmail and b) the
> MTAs I'm used to are very complicated, so they have lots of knobs;
> it's hard to drill down in the documentation to find the bits you care
> about.
I'm not sure what ``most MUAs'' represents, but perhaps this refers to
Outlook and Thunderbird (and other ``popular'' UI oriented MUAs)? If so,
don't most of these MUAs have an ``outbox'' which is actually just a
local mail queue built into the MUA which retries delivery to the
configured SMTP server?
Does nmh have a queue?
I've long thought that /usr/sbin/sendmail (or /usr/lib/sendmail on some
systems) was widely used by most CLI oriented MUAs (mutt, mailx, etc...)
precisely because they didn't have their own queue. I could be wrong.
:-)
If the goal is to make nmh behave more like popular MUAs, and work
independently of a properly configured MTA then, shouldn't nmh also have
a queue?
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000000055b6c849
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled., (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled., Kevin Cosgrove, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled., Ken Hornstein, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled., Martin G. McCormick, 2015/07/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled., Ken Hornstein, 2015/07/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled., Anthony J. Bentley, 2015/07/25
Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled., Ken Hornstein, 2015/07/27