[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:57:24 -0500 |
Norm wrote:
> Wouldn't the stderr from the procedure tend to mitigate that?
Yes, especially for compile problems, where the format compiler
issues a warning. For run-time problems, it depends on the
format contents. That gets back to my, and your, point about
how difficult those are to write.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Jerrad Pierce, 2015/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Paul Fox, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function,
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ken Hornstein, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, norm, 2015/01/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/01/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-format multiply function, David Levine, 2015/01/18