[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math
From: |
Eric Gillespie |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:46:12 -0800 |
address@hidden writes:
> Just to provide a data point, I want to look at the email and easily say
> "Oh, it was sent two hours ago." And the easiest way to do that is to have
> the date formatted in my local (or at least, my preferred) time zone.
>
> It doesn't matter to me that it was 16:30 UTC or 08:30 PST. Only that
> it was 11:30 *here* when it happened.
+1
That's how I've always thought about it. I spent many years
doing the math in my head before I found date2local; not too sure
when that was. This is what I use:
Date:formatfield="%<(nodate{text})%{text}%|%(date2local
{text})%(pretty{text})%>"
I never thought to try it for scan; I would vote for turning that
on by default, too.
Thanks.
- [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, norm, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, David Levine, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math,
Eric Gillespie <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Fox, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Bill Wohler, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, norm, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15