[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.6 has been released!

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.6 has been released!
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 15:51:24 -0500

>Not in 1.6; this change is not on the branch:

I WAS sort of vague on the details; I guess I should have said, "1.6
if you've got the right configuration, newer versions it will work
automatically."  But I didn't want to get bogged down into the weeds here.

>But I wonder if most people wouldn't prefer that you just stop
>including these; it's funny that the last post to mh-e-users
>before yours was a post about forcing MH-E not to download... :)

The archives (at least ones that are driven by MHonArc) and I'm told
Gmail does the right thing with those message/external-body parts.
Although that message DID break MHonArc (but any message with RFC 2231
parameter encoding would have done that; previous messages that didn't
have RFC 2231 encoding were fine).

What do others think?  I kind of think MH-E should be fixed!  I know those
are out of fashion now, but I still think they're convenient.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]