[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Applying alias file , to Reply-To: and From: component

From: norm
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Applying alias file , to Reply-To: and From: components of a draft
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:20:49 -0800

David Levine <address@hidden> writes:
>Norm wrote:
>> In my humble opinion, in each such instance you might want to
>> consider modifying the documentation, or, at least, somehow flag,
>> the need to modify the documentation.
>That's fine, but it's subjective.  Let us know how you'd
>like documentation to be modified.

My remark was to assert a general principle, not specifically directed to the
man page for mh-alias. The principle would apply not just to Ken Hornstein,
but to you as well. f you need to look at the sources then the documentation
is incomplete.

As to mh-alias, specifically, after Ken Hornstein's explanations I,
personally, no longer have a problem with it.

What would have helped me:

      Clarifying that only addressees in headers are affected.

      Stating, either directly, or indirectly, (or example by reference to the
      man page for post) exactly what headers are affected.

    Norman Shapiro

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]