[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:17:00 -0500 |
>I'm not saying that we have to follow that concept. But the thing that sticks
>out at me is that every new "module" in this implementation requires a source
>code change. That's what seems wrong. If some kind of new content shows up
>that we want to process and incorporate in a reply message, it shouldn't
>require changes to repl.
A clarification: I was speaking here about the proposed "calendar"
changes. My proposal for "modules" had some that were fixed and
internal, some that could be configured on the fly.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, Ken Hornstein, 2014/11/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] iCalendar support, David Levine, 2014/11/12