[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing
|
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing |
|
Date: |
Sat, 16 Aug 2014 16:02:59 +0100 |
Hi David,
> I'm looking now at replacing the use of fixed buffers with dynamic
> allocation in the format engine so that we could interpret -width 0
> (or -width max?) as infinite.
`-width ∞', surely. ;-)
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Paul Fox, 2014/08/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/25