[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Aug 2014 18:55:12 -0700 |
On Aug 3, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hm. I defer to your experience benchmarking other MIME parsers, but
> exactly what you were you thinking of, and how does it differ from
> what I described?
I'm just concerned about people getting side tracked chasing
micro-optimizations. I am all in favour of seeing all of the 822/MIME parsing
code re-written. I just don't want to see anyone waste a lot of time trying to
optimize the code for things that don't matter.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ken Hornstein, 2014/08/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing, David Levine, 2014/08/09