|
From: | Ken Hornstein |
Subject: | Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing |
Date: | Sun, 03 Aug 2014 19:25:57 -0400 |
>> It's worth noting that all of the examples I've seen in RFC 733 and >> RFC 822 are in the "modern" form; > >Never make the mistake of following the examples. The [A]BNF is always >normative. I was just trying to point out that even the grammar says that when you want to have a "display-name", it says to use the modern form. Comments are supposed to be ignored. That's always been the case. I'm unclear where the "old" form came from. --Ken
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |