[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:54:49 -0400 |
Ralph wrote:
> Is it definitely the only thing AT&T support?
No, as I noted earlier:
I just tried port 587 and it worked. I'll try living with
it for a while. But AT&T still hasn't documented it.
It could be argued that if it's not documented, it's not
supported, but I'm not going to pursue that. And my last
statement wasn't accurate: I couldn't find documentation
from AT&T. Maybe they have documented it (and hidden it:
their recommendation to use port 465 is easy to find).
To summarize the current status: With Lyndon's change to
default to the submission port, this is all that I had to
configure (in my .mh_profile) to send via AT&T:
credentials: file:.nmhcreds
send: -sasl -tls -server outbound.att.net
And of course set up that credentials file.
With the rest of Lyndon's proposal in place, we wouldn't need
the explicit -sasl -tls. Very nice.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, David Levine, 2014/07/07
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, bergman, 2014/07/08
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, David Levine, 2014/07/08
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, David Levine, 2014/07/08
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Bob Carragher, 2014/07/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission,
David Levine <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, David Levine, 2014/07/09