Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh not using w3n or elinks

[David Levine]

> >I still like the idea of including a simple built-in formatter.  I will
> >go play with htmlfmt and see just how much work it will be to port it.
> 
> I'm fine with either of these options.  If we include htmlfmt,

In general, I'm not fond of including third-party code.
It's a support and maintenance headache.  In this particular
case, I just don't think it's necessary.  We should already
handle html well, and wrapper scripts could make that even
better.

David