Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again

[Ken Hornstein]

>It's mostly about refile and delete, in the IMAP-MH case.  Client
>A deletes message 1.  Client B moves it to folder foo.  Who wins?
>Especially when B syncs after A, thus message 1 is no longer in place on
>the server.  (These are *very* simple examples of what you have to deal
>with ...)

It looks like to me ... the message ultimately gets deleted, in that
case, from a very brief examination of how OfflineIMAP works.

Of course, the question really should be: what SHOULD happen in that
case?

--Ken