[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 question

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 question
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 14:32:54 -0400

>Talking directly to AT&T's SMTP servers is a tad inconvenient
>now that they require SSL.  But I'll try later.

I think we have SSL support in send now, don't we?  Even the broke-ass
SSL required by AT&T? :-)  Okay, I don't think we have -initialtls
in 1.5.

This suggests to me that it's a bug with some SMTP servers that don't
handle a blank body properly.  I double-checled RFC5322; a blank body
is ok.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]