[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers

From: Paul Fox
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:34:01 -0400

lyndon wrote:
 > On 2013-04-03, at 5:25 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
 > >    $ scan unseen
 > >    ...notice that third-from-end message is spam...
 > >    $ refile unseen_3 +spam
 > I don't think '_' is a very good choice.  It's too commonly used as a word 
 > separator in text strings.  Why not use the Git convention: unseen~3 ?

but...  but...   dc predates git!  it must be better!


i agree that '_' is a little tainted -- i was surprised that it's
not legal in sequence names.  '_' is more mnemonic, for me at
least, but either would be fine.

 paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 28.2 degrees)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]