[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers

From: Jerrad Pierce
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:15:15 -0400

>digit message numbers.  believe me, "p last_4" is much less error
>prone than "p 365530".
Sorry, I wasn't clear. The error-proneness wasn't due to typing,
but in gauging which line of the displayed sequence was the message
you cared about. Although I suppose those who love this mode of
specifying messages might develop a scan format file that includes
sequence indices in the output...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]