Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking (specifically, sequences)

[Valdis . Kletnieks]

On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:38:13 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:

> >if "the MH way" could expand to C89 and posix threads, we'd have some
> >options that were both performance and correct.
>
> I think we already assume C89 as a minimum.  However, I'm not sure I want
> to jump off the threads cliff just yet :-/

"Some people see a problem and say "I know, I'll use threads". Now they
have two problems" - jwz, misquoted. :)

pgpEsth1JHtN7.pgp
Description: PGP signature