[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:44:05 +0000 |
Hi Paul,
> it would change the auto-generated length token from LEN_MARK to
> LEN_MARK_SWITCHES, but i'm not sure that matters.
Agreed. I guess I'm use to more complex cases where different nuts and
bolts have to be added on around the parameter so it has to be just the
base.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Paul Fox, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Paul Fox, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Paul Fox, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh internals: argument processing, David Levine, 2013/01/08