[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld

From: David Levine
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:45:49 -0600

> >Yes, but by "different purposes" I was thinking how scan
> >digs back into the IO buffers.  Though maybe that won't
> >be necessary any more.
> I had forgotten about that.  Okay, looking at that now .... alright,
> that's not as nasty as I thought.  All it does is to use the output
> stdio buffer as the input buffer for m_getfld() so we can avoid an extra
> copy.  Can we all agree that's not necessary anymore, and the resulting
> performance gain is probably miniscule?  If so, I can simply get rid of
> that garbage now.

Fine with me.

Would a perf test be to pack a big folder into an mbox and
then scan that?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]