[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:22:05 -0500

>Would a more general -noprofileparam be a more useful addition to
>argument processing?  That way, pick, scan, etc., when used in scripts
>wouldn't be tainted by the user's preferences;  I may like pick to have
>-nozero by default.

We already have a LOT of -no* options to override particular options
set in your profile.  We're missing a few ones; that's what we're
talking about here.  I'm not against -noprofileparam, exactly, but
I think it's a bit more complicated than you think (by the time
smatch() starts parsing the options it's too late)..  But I'm fine
with -nosequence; like I said, it follows an already-established


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]