[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:22:05 -0500 |
>Would a more general -noprofileparam be a more useful addition to
>argument processing? That way, pick, scan, etc., when used in scripts
>wouldn't be tainted by the user's preferences; I may like pick to have
>-nozero by default.
We already have a LOT of -no* options to override particular options
set in your profile. We're missing a few ones; that's what we're
talking about here. I'm not against -noprofileparam, exactly, but
I think it's a bit more complicated than you think (by the time
smatch() starts parsing the options it's too late).. But I'm fine
with -nosequence; like I said, it follows an already-established
pattern.
--Ken