[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies.
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies. |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:08:28 -0600 |
Ken wrote:
> >+ /* If using an rmmproc, check for MAXARGS overflow before
> >+ modifying anything. If not using an rmmproc, we don't
> >+ pass the message files to another process, so this check
> >+ isn't necessary. This check also isn't necessary if
> >+ NFOLDERS < MAXARGS - 1, because there's a check above for
> >+ filep <=3D NFOLDERS, but do it in that case just to be safe. =
> */
>
> Paul Fox's patch removes the MAXARGS limit, so I don't think capping the
> limit to MAXARGS in refile is right. Maybe this isn't a problem anymore
> in practice since newer operating systems have huge execve() limits?
And the dynamic allocation of the vector to hold the arguments is
unlikely to fail. Fine with me.
David