[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits.

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Artificial argv limits.
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:32:37 -0500

>It seems a bad idea to me.  It's just punting the expansion problem
>further downstream.  A plain `pick <args>' would take my ~/.mh_profile
>into account and my `lp', last picked, sequence would get trampled.
>rmmproc's task is to deal with the files, that should be its interface.

Right, for example my rmmproc command is "rm".  Having to modify it to
handle "all" would be an interface change.

(Note how one simple bug report ends up unravelling the gigantic sweater
that is MH/nmh?  Sigh).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]