Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.

[Bill Wohler]

Kevin Cosgrove <address@hidden> writes:

> On 11 October 2012 at 10:35, Joel Uckelman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Speaking for myself only: I can't recall a single time in 15 years of
>> using nmh that I've wanted to use sortm to sort less than a complete
>> folder.
>
> I have two use cases for sortm
>
>  1.  sortm +folder
>
>  2.  sortm -textfield subject -limit 0 +folder

Me too. I don't think I've ever used sortm with a sequence.

Glad -all became the default. Throwing an error if explicit messages
were not specified would have broken MH-E.

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD