[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?

From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] relative message numbers?
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:16:33 +0100

Hi Paul,

> jerrad wrote:
> > I don't really understand how relative numbers are useful, but if
> > they are to be introduced why not use the same signifier as for
> > folders?  i.e; @
> > 
> > address@hidden = cur+2  address@hidden = cur-4
> i'm also not sure how '@' relates to folders.

Perhaps Jerrad was referring to `@' being used instead of `+' for
relative folders.

    folder +inbox
    refile @example last    # Means +inbox/example.

Cheers, Ralph.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]