[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?
From: |
jon |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:57:13 -0700 |
Ken Hornstein writes:
> >I have a slightly modified version that removes the default Fcc stuff that
> >was
> >added some time ago and drives me crazy as I don't want that.
>
> So, yeah, that's the reason. I don't think there was ever a chance we
> could ever hope to modify user's components files in a sane manner. The
> default ones shipped with nmh work.
>
> I kinda thought the error message you got was ... obvious? And told
> you what you needed to look at? What would have helped?
>
> --Ken
This was obvious to someone paying attention to the guts of nmh. Which I
haven't been recently. A more user-friendly diagnostic might be:
Your components files are not compatible with this version of nmh.
You have modified them so we were unable to automatically update them.
You need to go to /etc/nmh and merge in the changes to the components,
forwcomps, replcomps, and replgroupcomps files. If you're in a hurry
you can add a From: header to this message so that it can be sent.
Jon
- [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Jon Steinhart, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Jerrad Pierce, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Jerrad Pierce, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?,
jon <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, jon, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Tethys, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/07/18
Re: [Nmh-workers] new nmh broken?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/07/18