Re: [Nmh-workers] mime-aware filtering?

[Paul Vixie]

On 2012-06-26 2:28 AM, Jon Steinhart wrote:
> Paul Vixie writes:
>
>> let's start talking about what it should look like?
> Well, for starters, it shouldn't include any threatening commmentary!
> Big thing that I think that it needs other than cleanup is the ability
> to scan for attachment part headers instead of stopping at the end of
> regular headers.

well that didn't take long. :-).

m_getfld() is the heart of MH. everything about the storage and access
model is contained in it, either by its signature or its logic. i'm
opposed to grafting MIME onto it with a couple more arguments that if
non-NULL will trigger additional behaviour.

so when i say "let's talk about what m_getfld should look like" i really
mean "let's talk about what MH's storage and access model should be."

int
m_getfld (int state, unsigned char *name, unsigned char *buf,
          int bufsz, FILE *iob)

your move.

paul