[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable

From: norm
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] mhmail is now stable
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:18:51 -0700

David Levine <address@hidden> writes:
>Norm wrote:
>> David Levine <address@hidden> writes:
>> >
>> >mhmail [addrs ...] [-attach file] [-body text] [-cc addrs ...]
>> >[-from addr] [-header-field name:body] [-subject subject]
>> >[switches for post ... | -profile [switches for send ...]]
>> >[-resent] [-send | -nosend] [-version] [-help]
>> >
>> >There can be multiple -attach and -header-field switches.
>> Also multiple -cc fields?
>Yes.  As before, there can be multiple cc addresses, either
>in separate -cc switches or together.  So this:
>recip1 -cc recip2 recip3 -cc recip4
>results in:
>To: recip1
>Cc: recip2, recip3, recip4
>There can be intervening switches between addresses. To
>avoid confusion, -attach and -header-field each require
>exactly one argument (whoops, that needs to be enforced).
>So they can appear multiple times.
>An address goes to Cc: if -cc has appeared anywhere on the
>command line before it, To: if not.  Again, that behavior
>has been retained from compiled mhmail.

Had I realized that, I would have suggested a, sometimes but always, redundant, 
-to switch.

    Norman Shapiro

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]