[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject ou
From: |
paul vixie |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2012 04:52:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 5/21/2012 2:44 AM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>> Considering that this has never worked before, it seems a bit late in
>> the release cycle to be fixing it post-RC2.
> Well, I guess it depends on your perspective. Is this a portability
> problem? Linux (the one I tested) returns 0 for isspace() &&
> iscntrl() > 127. If that's true for you, it works fine.
weighing in a second time on the same thread: it's not a regression nor
a new bug and so would normally not warrant a post-RC fix. but it's been
busted for a long time and it *is* a portability problem not a logic
problem. so i'm edged over to the "yes we should fix it in 1.5" answer.
> It may be that fixing cpstripped() (works for some systems, not
> others) is one problem and fixing the scan output (has never worked
> for anybody) is another problem. Let's just consider the former:
> fix for 1.5 or not?
to repeat: if you can write a couple of tests, and if this mailing list
reviews the patch, i'm +1 to it.
paul
- [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/05/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Tom Lane, 2012/05/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/05/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?,
paul vixie <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Tethys, 2012/05/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/05/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Tom Lane, 2012/05/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/05/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Tom Lane, 2012/05/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/05/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, Tethys, 2012/05/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/05/24
Re: [Nmh-workers] A € for your thoughts - should we fix UTF-8 subject output in scan for 1.5?, paul vixie, 2012/05/21