[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

From: rader
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:51:42 -0500

 > > Looking at things ... it may be a simple fix, actually.  I wasn't
 > > envisioning any changes to m_getfld(), that's for sure.
 > Alright, I think I've got a fix in there, and I've got a test which exercises
 > the bug.  I was right that the fix was simple, but I had to take into
 > account all of the ways that scansbr.c was used.  The only downside is that
 > scan may sometimes do an extra read() when it doesn't have to, but that would
 > only happen if your headers approach the 4k mark (like Steve's).

Ken, sorry, hate to say it, but...

 $ git clone git://git.savannah.nongnu.org/nmh.git
 $ mv nmh nmh-`date +%Y%m%d`
 $ cd nmh-`date +%Y%m%d`
 $ autoreconf
 $ ./configure
 $ make
 $ uip/scan +scan-bug
    1  Fri Mar 16 09:13  Ken Hornstein      Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files | 
>Rather than pr
    2  Fri Mar 16 10:35  Ken Hornstein      Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files | 
>If we pr
    3  Thu Mar 15 17:43  Jon Steinhart      Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files | 
    4  Wed Mar 14 19:32  Nico Kadel-Garcia  Re: wine 1.4 is out | --
    6  Wed Mar 14 10:22  REDACTED           Resolving dependency problems | For 
the last

...SL54 + autoconf 2.68.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]