[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

From: Valdis . Kletnieks
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:22:34 -0400

On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:46:46 CDT, address@hidden said:
> Can someone/anyone replicate?  Test with the msg from Ken to this list today,
> March 16 2012 at 11:35:44 -0400?

Wow.  So I'm not hallucinating (at least not this time :)

Been seeing this, haven't had a chance to track it down. Looking at exmh's
.xmhcache files, I have 145,141 total messages listed in .xmhcache entries, and
the bug is affecting 3,266 of them. So there's an anectodal value for the 

A few random samplings from my NANOG folder:

45498    *  Fri 17Feb    5442 Sven Olaf Kamphui  RE: Colo Vending Machine <<On 
45533    *  Fri 17Feb    4658 Owen DeLong        Re: Common operational 
misconceptions <<On Feb 17, 2012, at 11:04 A
45536    *  Sat 18Feb    5813 Masataka Ohta      Re: Common operational 
misconceptions <<David Ba
45588    *  Mon 20Feb    4990 Lamar Owen         Re: WW: Colo Vending Machine 
<<On Friday, February 17, 201
45814   R*  Wed  7Mar    5746 Jack Bates         Re: Huawei edge routers.. <<On 
3/7/2012 9
45927    *  Tue 13Mar    4564 Joel jaeggli       Re: shared address space... a 
reality! <<On 
45964       21:10 EDT    4403 To:address@hidden  Clueful security contact at 
humana.com? <<An

A quick test shows it's stable - several different scan patterns consistently
failed the same messages in my NANOG folder (scan last:100, scan 45498 45533,
etc etc),

Interestingly enough, Ken's 11:35 message did *not* trip over the bug, so
there's some state that's different between your machine and mine.  My first
guess is number/length of Received: headers?

Attachment: pgpxYzUWaeEqC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]