[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] The curse of m_getfld()

From: David Levine
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] The curse of m_getfld()
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:43:48 -0400

paul wrote:

> (does nmh have a regression test suite of any kind?)

It was recently revived and is being expanded.  The last
time Peter Maydell touched m_getfld.c, he added two torture
tests of it.  So we're in good shape.

Here's the coverage of the entire test suite on m_getfld.c:

  File 'sbr/m_getfld.c'
  Lines executed:74.01% of 177
  sbr/m_getfld.c:creating 'sbr#m_getfld.c.gcov'

That's (only!) 177 executable lines.  That .gcov file shows
which lines were/were not covered.  Some of the uncovered
lines are to handle error conditions, others are to handle
MMDF maildrops and MSH format.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]