Re: [Nmh-workers] Implementation question: function or component for local mailbox?

[Earl Hood]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> Okay ... so now that's been cleared up :-)
>
> Do people like the idea of:
>
> - A dedicated function %(localmbox)
> - A pseudo component %{localmbox}
> - Extra primitives to build the default local mailbox (%(myname), %(myhost)).

If you go with a pseudo component, I recommend using a well-defined
prefix for it to avoid any potential collisions with a real component.

For example: %{nmh-localmbox}

--ewh