[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Nmh-workers] formatting headers - a weird case

From: Jon Steinhart
Subject: [Nmh-workers] formatting headers - a weird case
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:42:21 -0800

The existing code applies a user-settable format string to parsed headers to 
the scan listing.  Part of how this works is to generate a list of headers 
by the format string so that only those headers are extracted.  However, this 
quite work in all cases.  For example, this recent message from Earl:

> Date:    Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:30:37 CST
> To:      Jon Steinhart <address@hidden>
> cc:      address@hidden
> From:    Earl Hood <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] character sets and localization
> Return-Path: address@hidden
> Delivery-Date: Sat Nov 13 10:32:33 2010
> Return-Path: <address@hidden>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
>        :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
>        :from:to:cc:content-type;
>        bh=e1pTfthwujlXK1apKyvhs+nsZNEe8XV1OqGdD8qr9oc=;
>        b=eb9C5xr177Yim0k/y+EOAud0SXI1BGRpVTi8Q9982OAnLjI0d3E5YMMDqhQhMfBKTi
>        9kPuaP2tL7132/W1UR98xZ9Xkqafj6BE57uhtypARLhHeeV5IjcfYaZR2zEilR+R7Do7
>        Vwqs9TNMCd+kFftJ1/UX6zD3lAQcWPlkD1L8w=
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
>        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
>        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
>        :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
>        b=IS/rdEVgugqAKKXOlkvCvwWLUPMlz3lgICdsbuFcwx70Rk64FElUebGvZpSZHga/c6
>        ByYcUMuZr1U0FPTreaZu6TitTTTJDH91eulLv0yvIowlp2hGbnylw/yfPlS5T7/3v6LV
>        EZ799tOZeihEt36WVUa4tpqHHaEOGX21PihHI=
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Sender:  address@hidden
> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
> References: <address@hidden>
>        <address@hidden>
>        <address@hidden>
> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1KTQ8_dSmNGH2kLYPSk_Vb-4Ezk

Note that there are two Return-Path header fields.  If you do a scan -format 
you'll get the value of the last one.  Is that what we want?  What is the 
proper formatting
of header fields that occur more than once.  BTW, I haven't checked, but I'd 
guess that this
is a memory leak!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]