[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?
From: |
Jerry Peek |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:16:28 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) |
On 10/18/2008 07:07 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> I'm hoping to run (exmh over) nmh over sshfs, but it doesn't work
> because 1) sshfs doesn't implement link()...
>
When I ran Evolution a few years ago and told it about my MH message
tree, it went through the tree and broke all of my message links.
Because I like the ability to have a message appear in all of the
folders where it might belong, I haven't used Evolution since. (I also
filed a bug report, but I haven't checked whether anyone was able to fix
it -- or did.)
Still, for compatibility with non-*nix filesystems, would it makes sense
for nmh to have a "no-links" configuration option? I haven't looked at
the code to see how possible that might be... just an idea.
Jerry
- [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?,
Jerry Peek <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Peter Maydell, 2008/10/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Jerry Peek, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, rader, 2008/10/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?, Robert Elz, 2008/10/20