[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:32:17 -0400 |
joel wrote:
> 1) Some people have commented on the comp.mail.mh newsgroup that Bcc and
> Dcc headers should not be removed before Fcc is processed, so that the
> Fcc copy contains them. Since the default components has
> Fcc: +outbox
> in it I'm inclined to agree. Does anyone disagree? Perhaps there
> should be an option to "send" for this so we can have it both ways,
> but I honestly don't see what could be desirable about the current
> behaviour.
isn't the risk that, if you forward someone a copy from your outbox,
that it will contain the bcc headers?
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 35.8 degrees)
- [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Joel Reicher, 2007/03/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Neil W Rickert, 2007/03/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Joel Reicher, 2007/03/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Ralph Corderoy, 2007/03/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Jerrad Pierce, 2007/03/31
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.3 release and Dcc/Bcc behaviour, Jerry Peek, 2007/03/30