[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?

From: pmaydell
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:16:55 +0000

Joel Reicher wrote:
>The bug reports (with patches) that I've done over the past couple of
>months are certainly there, but nobody's picking them up. I'm pretty sure
>it's not a Savannah problem. There are reports (with patches) from other
>people that go back a year or two.

I did go through the elderly bug reports prior to the 1.2 release
(speaking of which, aren't we going to try for a 1.2.1 now?) -- but
I didn't do anything with (a) new features or (b) patches to areas of
the system I couldn't test (SASL, platforms I don't have, etc).

(The BTS is rather unwieldy, incidentally: I repeat my plea for somebody
with admin access to define some more useful Item Groups and Categories.
Also the division between 'bugs' and 'patches' seems a bit weird and we
have a lot of bugs with patches still filed under 'bugs'.)

I don't currently expect to have a lot of time to spend on nmh, though.

-- PMM

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]