Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal

[Nathan Bailey]

We could make it an X-Header (X-MH-Bcc?).  Most other email agents don't 
show extra X headers, so it we achieve security through obscurity ;-)

re,
N

address@hidden wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 09:22:44 PST, Bill Wohler said:
> > address@hidden writes:
> >
> > > 	dist should be enhanced so that if the original message being 
> > > 	redistributed has BCC recipients, that recipient list is supressed
> > >         when the copy is redistributed
> > Yes, that would allow information to be saved in the Fcc while not
> > endangering the bcc list.
>
> What about 'forw -mime'?   This looks like a can of worms. ;)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers