Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0

[Joel Reicher]

> > well, it doesn't take the "References" or "In-reply-to" headers
> > into account.
> 
> No, but most of the time this is not necessary. However sortm -thread
> would be a nice thing. And pick -thread <message number> too.

I think pick and sortm are definitely the right place to start with
this. Are you thinking pick -thread should gather sibling and parent
threads? Subthreads get orphaned, sometimes you want to see "above" the
current message in a thread, etc.

Cheers,

        - Joel