[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:10:03 -0500 |
> > * Threading support. This is one of the obvious things missing from
> > nmh that just about all modern mailers support.
>
> I'm not that sure about this. After all it's about e-mail not usenet.
> I have something like
>
> thread () {
> pick -subject $1 -seq thread
> scan thread
> }
>
> which does all I need.
well, it doesn't take the "References" or "In-reply-to" headers
into account.
but more importantly, there's no way to easily view messages in a
sequence (like your "thread", above), sequentially, right? if
not, then simply getting the message numbers of the thread isn't
all that useful, since i still can't easily read them in order.
i want to isolate the thread, and then be able to prev and next
through it. so i think your method might be okay, if there were
a "-seq" option to prev and next, which meant "next in sequence".
(as always, i'm happy to be corrected, if someone can show me
how to write a "threadnext" or "threadprev" alias using existing
tools.)
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 26.4 degrees)
- [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, pmaydell, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Harald Geyer, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Paul Fox, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Michael Richardson, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22