[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] content-disposition (was Re: flattening continuation l

From: Oliver Kiddle
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] content-disposition (was Re: flattening continuation lines )
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:54:59 +0200

Paul Fox wrote:
> so basically, the entire text between the { } pair would fully
> specify the Content-disposition header, but that unlike
> Content-description (which has no default value), the
> Content-disposition header would have a default value of
>       attachment; filename="<file basename>"
> does that sound right?


In some situations (such as multipart parts), it would default to adding
no Content-disposition header and where there is no filename because the
content is specified inline, it would use a value of inline for the
header. I'll have a closer look at what other mailers produce.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]