Re: [Nano-devel] Should we rename and untypedef nano's structs?

[Benno Schulenberg]

Op 19-08-18 om 16:30 schreef Devin Hussey:
> nano's struct types are weird, and the typedefs are inconsistent with
> the snake case and themselves. Some of them are extremely confusing.

What's "snake case"?

But true, nano's structs are poorly named and confusing.

> filestruct is a useless typedef that saves a single space, and doesn't
> represent a file itself, rather a line/node.
> openfilestruct is the actual filestruct.
> sc is shortcut, but it doesn't look like it.

All three true.

> subnfunc... what the hell does subn mean?

I have no idea.

> So my ideas:
> 
> filestruct -> struct node, struct line
> openfilestruct -> struct file, struct open_file, struct buffer
> sc -> struct kbd_shortcut, struct shortcut
> [...]

What they should be renamed to, I don't know.  And we won't
rename them all at once.  One at a time.

Benno

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature