Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: nano's justifications are poorer than those of Pico -- okay to improve?

[David Ramsey]

Benno Schulenberg:
> 1) I think nano should recognize indented paragraphs also when
> --autoindent is not given.  Okay to change?
>
> 2) Nano should do the same as Pico in this case: the indentation of a
> paragraph may not change after its second line.  Okay to change?
>
> 3) I think nano should be improved to treat paragraphs like ne does.
> Okay to change?

All three of these sound good to me.  Justification should work the same
regardless of autoindent, Pico compatibility is definitely a priority,
and justification is handy enough (under the right circumstances) that
it should be smarter.