[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt
From: |
David Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:49:25 -0500 |
Benno Schulenberg:
> You mean a real, physical console? Or a VT, a Linux virtual console?
> If the latter, a new console is just one Alt+Left/Right away. I used
> to do that when I worked on VTs.
The latter, and thanks; that's good to know.
> But nano does not save the search and position histories when it gets
> terminated -- it will only save the currently open file buffers. The
> history from previous sessions will still be there, but not the one
> from the current session. So possible crashes cannot be an argument
> for including persistence.
Okay. Although, in the long term, maybe nano should save its histories
when it gets terminated, just for the sake of avoiding unnecessary data
loss?
> Okay, I'll accept persistent execute history -- when it gets saved in
> a far more economical way: in the .nano/search_history file.
Also good to know.
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt, (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt, David Ramsey, 2017/09/05
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt, Marco Diego Aurélio Mesquita, 2017/09/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt, David Ramsey, 2017/09/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt, David Ramsey, 2017/09/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Improve execute command prompt,
David Ramsey <=