[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:51:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.9.4 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.9.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Monday, January 14, 2013 12:26:46 Joshua Rogers wrote:
> Well, it is classified as a vulnerability, even if it is a very small
> one(DoS)
What exactly do you classify as DoS? Does it consume too much memory before
it crashes?
What is the original contents of the file you are editing? I am unable to
repeat the crash...
Kamil
- [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Chris Allegretta, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Chris Allegretta, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Benno Schulenberg, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Eitan Adler, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Mike Frysinger, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Eitan Adler, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability,
Kamil Dudka <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Mike Frysinger, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Chris Allegretta, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14