[Nano-devel] Re: rebindable keys and hello again

[Chris Allegretta]

Hmm,  while I'm waiting for that mail I sent last night to arrive back in my 
inbox, I thought of a new question.  After using subversion for work,
going back to cvs is too painful to endure.  Not being able to work
offline is a real deal killer.  I'd like to migrate the repository to git or 
GNU arch, which are currently the only choices Savannah seems to 
offer, but I'm sure either is better than CVS.  I was  curious if anyone 
tracking our cvs had a preference one way or the other .

Based on the fact that git is good enough for the Linux kernel folks,
I'm guessing it will meet our needs, so that's how I'm leaning, but 
throwing it out for discussion.

On 3/5/08, Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:

Hello,

I just committed the first pass at rebindable keys to HEAD.  It's still
fairly broken (see BUGS for a partial list) but it does actually work.
I plan to fix these bugs shortly but wanted to get it out there for
people to look at.

As always, if anyone would like a tarball due to lacking cvs access,
just say the word.  Please, no requests for windows binaries.

Chris A

--
Chris Allegretta        http://www.asty.org

v4sw7CUPYhw5ln6pr5Pck4ma7u7Lw0m6g/l7DUi5e6t5Ab6THen7g6Ma29s5r3p-4 hackerkey.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHzk+2vLNW35EAn6cRAsVBAJ9/nWte4MtCTedccfvwgN7Da1AwuQCglbMr
NDI34qKnCvMfDt84geXIbX8=
=lRwv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----